sure leverage funding prop firm

Sure Leverage Funding

Tradable Asset

CEO

Sebastian Ness

Date Created

Coupon Code

Cashback

Firm Highlights

Score

8.3

Trust Pilot Score

4.2

Score

8.3

Awards

Coupon Code

Ranking Breakdown

Pricing 8.3
Trading Rules 8.4
Platform 8.5
Deposit & Withdrawal 8.1
Features 8.3

Overall Score

8.3

Firm Overview

Trading Platform:

Withdrawal Methods:

Payment Methods:

Brokers:

Customer Reviews

See what traders are saying about Sure Leverage Funding.

1 Reviews Average Rating
5.0
Out of 5
5 Stars
100%
4 Stars
0%
3 Stars
0%
2 Stars
0%
1 Stars
0%

All Reviews (1)

LO
6 days ago

I have a great experience with this firm. I really like this firm. support system is so good

Write a Review

Share your experience with Sure Leverage Funding

Please select a rating.
Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you sign up through them, FundedTrading may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This review was rebuilt using Sure Leverage Funding’s current public rule pages, help-center articles, and public review profile.

Sure Leverage Funding Review 2026: Instant Funding Rules, Payouts, Platforms, and Coupon Code

Quick verdict: Sure Leverage Funding is most interesting for traders who want instant funding with an 8% static drawdown on its standard Instant Funding product. That is still the clearest reason to look at SLF. The trade-off is that the rulebook is now much broader and harder to follow than older reviews suggest. If you want one clean setup, SLF can feel busy. If you want product choice and care most about static instant funding, it is much more competitive.

Best hook8% static drawdown on standard Instant Funding
PlatformsMT5 and TradeLocker on the current platform page
Payout routeRise or USDT TRC20
Guarantee24 business hours or extra 10% on the split
Min withdrawal$100
Trustpilot4.2/5 from 1,352 reviews when checked
Table of Contents

Sure Leverage Funding Coupon Code

The current FundedTrading code for Sure Leverage Funding is FT, which gives 30% off. That makes SLF easier to test if you are comparing it with other names in the best no evaluation prop firms space.

How to use it: Pick your account, enter FT at checkout, and re-check the final rule set before you pay. With SLF, the product choice matters more than the discount.

Sure Leverage Funding At a Glance

Main retail productsInstant Funding, Instant Funding Pro, Instant Funding Zero, 1 Step, 2 Step, EA Challenge, Free Challenge, Buy Now Pay Later
Strongest edgeStandard Instant Funding still uses an 8% static drawdown that does not trail profits
Payout profile24 business hour processing promise, but most products cap withdrawals at 5% of starting balance per cycle
Funding limitsPublic rules conflict between a $400,000 total cap across programs and a $200,000 active funding cap
Current payout routesRise and USDT TRC20, with a 2% or $10 minimum transaction fee
Biggest cautionSoft-breach deductions, mandatory stop-loss rules, and product-specific consistency rules add real payout friction

Important: SLF’s public rulebook is spread across several help-center articles, and some pages do not line up perfectly. The safest way to read SLF is product by product, not from one headline claim.

What Is Sure Leverage Funding?

Sure Leverage Funding is a prop firm built around instant funding first, then evaluation products second. Its public documents and policies point to the UAE through ASAP Solutions FZ-LLC / SureLeverage, and its current help center shows a wide retail lineup built around fast payouts, MT5 and TradeLocker access, and several different drawdown models.

The reason traders still search for Sure Leverage Funding is simple: the standard Instant Funding account offers a static drawdown, while many other instant-funding firms use a trailing model that gets tighter as you make money. If that difference is new to you, this short drawdown explainer from Fidelity helps.

That said, older reviews now miss the bigger picture. SLF is no longer just “Standard vs Pro.” It now has Zero, Buy Now Pay Later, a Free Challenge, and an EA path. That gives traders more choice, but it also means more room to buy the wrong product for your style.

Current Account Types and Entry Cost

SLF’s public help-center articles make the product structure clear, even when a clean live fee grid is not easy to verify from public pages. What we can verify with confidence is the entry path and the rule design behind each product.

Product Best For Key Rule Profit Split What to Watch
Instant Funding Traders who want instant access with more room to breathe 8% static max drawdown, 4% daily, 25% consistency 50% on first payout, rising to 80% No EAs, 5% profit cap per cycle
Instant Funding Pro Traders who want instant access and an 80% split from payout one 7% trailing max drawdown, 3% daily, 20% consistency 80% No instant payouts, tighter risk model, 200k Pro accounts drop to 15% consistency
Instant Funding Zero Traders who hate profit consistency rules No profit consistency, 5% trailing max drawdown, 3% daily 70% No red-news trading, 3% buffer rule before payout, max funding 100k
1 Step Challenge Traders who want a single evaluation phase 8% target, 8% trailing max drawdown, 4% daily 80% No EAs, funded-stage consistency checks still matter for payouts
2 Step Challenge Traders who want the cleanest static evaluation model 10% then 5% targets, 10% static max drawdown, 5% daily 80% Still has payout consistency and lot-size checks after funding
EA Challenge Traders who use bots to pass evaluations EAs allowed only in the challenge phase 50% on first payout, rising to 80% EAs are banned once funded
Free Challenge Very low-cost testing $1 to $5 activation for a path to a funded 5k 2 Step account 50% Small funded size, lower split
Buy Now Pay Later Traders who want to risk only $10 upfront $10 activation, full fee due only if you pass 80% Funded phase uses a 6% trailing drawdown and no instant payout

Pricing view: The minimum low-risk entry still exists, but the bigger buying decision is not the sticker price. It is whether you want static drawdown, trailing drawdown, no consistency, or a low-cost evaluation path. If cost is your first filter, compare SLF with our list of cheap prop firms with 100k accounts and the wider instant funding vs evaluation breakdown.

Refund policy: SLF’s current public rules say evaluation fees bought after January 9, 2026 can be claimed back on the fourth payout. Earlier purchases were non-refundable.

Rules That Matter Before You Buy

The old draft was right about one thing: the standard Instant Funding account is still the easiest SLF product to defend. Its 8% static drawdown is much easier to live with than a trailing model if you hold winners or scale gradually. For most traders, that is still the core decision.

1. Standard Instant Funding vs Pro is still the main fork

Choose standard Instant Funding if you want the simpler risk model. The max drawdown stays fixed at 8% of starting balance. Choose Pro only if the higher starting split matters more to you than risk flexibility. Pro gives you 80% from the first payout, but the 7% trailing drawdown and stricter consistency make it less forgiving.

2. Zero removes consistency, but it is not the “easy” option

Instant Funding Zero removes the profit consistency rule, which sounds great on paper. In practice, it replaces that with a tighter 5% trailing drawdown, a 3% daily loss limit, no red-news trading window, a 3% payout buffer, and a lower 70% split. It is cleaner in one way and harsher in several others.

3. SLF now uses soft-breach deductions across multiple products

Missing a stop loss, breaking lot consistency, or triggering other soft-breach rules does not always close the account immediately. Instead, profits can be deducted at payout review. That matters because a trader can think the account is fine, then find out later that the payout was reduced or denied.

4. The stop-loss rule is not optional

Across the current help-center articles, funded accounts require a stop loss within five minutes of opening a trade. Older public schedule documents still show a one-minute version, so the public record is messy here. The safer assumption is simple: place the stop loss immediately and do not test the edge of the rule. If you need a basic refresher on the order itself, the SEC’s trading basics guide covers stop orders in plain English.

5. Some newer products also carry a floating-loss penalty

SLF now uses a 1% floating equity rule on some newer products and newer purchases. Public pages are not fully consistent on the exact start date and product coverage, but the practical message is clear: letting open losses drift too far below starting balance can cut your split or close the account. This is one of the biggest reasons SLF works better for controlled traders than for aggressive swing-taking.

Low signal, high risk: SLF’s public pages also disagree on some broader account rules. One general-rules page says the total funding cap is $400,000 across all programs. Another says the active cap is $200,000. Confirm this with support before stacking accounts.

Payouts, Profit Split, and Withdrawal Friction

SLF remains strong on payout speed. Most current products are tied to a 24 business hour payout guarantee. If the firm misses that window, it says it adds an extra 10% on top of the payout split. Payout routes currently listed are Rise and USDT on TRC20.

Product Payout Frequency Starting Split Main Friction
Instant Funding Regularly every 14 days, with instant requests available when eligible 50%, rising to 80% 5% profit cap and 25% consistency
Instant Funding Pro Every 14 days 80% No instant payout requests
Instant Funding Zero Every 14 days 70% 3% buffer rule and no red-news trading
1 Step and 2 Step Instant payout request once eligible 80% Soft-breach review still applies
Free Challenge Every 14 days 50% Low funded size and lower split

There are two catches older reviews often gloss over. First, SLF’s public rules say accounts reset to starting balance after payout. Second, there is currently a 2% or $10 minimum transaction fee on payouts, and the minimum withdrawal is $100.

That means the payout promise is fast, but it is not “unlimited crypto freedom” in the way older copy framed it. Yes, crypto payouts are available. No, that does not remove the 5% cycle cap that appears across much of the product range.

Platforms and Instruments

The current platform rules page lists MetaTrader 5 and TradeLocker. An older SLF platform page still mentions Match-Trader, but the newer page only shows MT5 and TradeLocker, so that is the safer live assumption.

SLF says traders can access FX majors and minors, exotics, indices, gold, commodities, and selected cryptocurrencies. The current funded-phase leverage published on the newer platform rules page is up to 1:30. If platform choice is a deciding factor, compare SLF with our lists of best TradeLocker prop firms and best MT5 prop firms.

Authority link: If you are not familiar with MetaTrader 5, it is one of the most widely used trading platforms in the retail prop space.

One more rule that stands out: SLF’s current platform page says VPS and VPN usage are not permitted. That is stricter than many firms and worth noting if your workflow depends on remote execution tools.

Sure Leverage Funding Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Standard Instant Funding still offers an 8% static drawdown, which is rare and useful.
  • Product range is broad enough to fit different trader styles.
  • 1 Step and 2 Step currently offer instant payout requests once eligible.
  • Free Challenge and Buy Now Pay Later give low-cost ways to test the firm.
  • Current public rules support MT5, TradeLocker, USDT payouts, and fast processing.

Cons

  • The rulebook is spread across many pages and some public details conflict.
  • Soft-breach deductions create payout risk even when the account looks active.
  • Many products cap withdrawal to 5% of starting balance per cycle.
  • EAs are only allowed during the EA Challenge phase, not in funded trading.
  • VPS and VPN restrictions will turn some traders away.

Best for: Traders who want static drawdown on an instant-funded account, or traders who want several entry paths from one brand.

Who should avoid it: Traders who want one simple universal rule set, funded-stage bot trading, or a fully transparent public fee and policy map with no conflicting pages.

Is Sure Leverage Funding Legit?

Is Sure Leverage Funding legit? It looks like a real operating prop brand with an active help center, public policies, visible payout procedures, and a live Trustpilot profile that showed 4.2 out of 5 from 1,352 reviews when checked on May 7, 2026.

That does not mean every trader will like it. SLF’s biggest weakness is not that it looks fake. It is that the rule system has become more layered over time. Public pages disagree on some cap limits, older documents still circulate with outdated platform and stop-loss details, and some newer products add less obvious penalties like the 1% floating-equity rule.

There is also one important truth SLF states clearly in its public rules: these are demo accounts using live market quotes, and the firm may A-book or copy its best traders at its own discretion. That is standard language in this space, but traders should still read it carefully.

So the honest answer is this: SLF looks operational and current, but you should trust the exact product rule page more than any broad slogan, including this review.

Sure Leverage Funding Alternatives

Alternative Best For Why Compare It
FXIFY review Traders who want more product variety from a bigger brand profile Good comparison if you like multiple account models but want a more mature review trail.
Instant Funding review Traders focused on no-evaluation access Useful if instant funding is your only goal and you want another direct benchmark.
FundingPips review Traders who want a better-known comparison name in the retail prop space Helpful if you care more about brand familiarity than SLF’s static-drawdown niche.

For broader context, SLF also belongs in the same conversation as our guides to best no evaluation prop firms and prop firm drawdown rules.

Final Verdict

Sure Leverage Funding is still most attractive when you judge it through one lens: standard Instant Funding with static drawdown. That remains the best reason to choose it over a lot of instant-funding rivals.

Outside of that, the firm is now more complex than older reviews make it sound. Some traders will like the extra choice. Others will see too many products, too many payout conditions, and too much rule-page sprawl. If you are considering SLF, pick the product first, read its exact rule page second, and only then think about the discount.

Best Fit Summary

Choose Sure Leverage Funding if you want static instant funding and are disciplined enough to manage stop-loss, consistency, and payout-review rules. Skip it if you want a cleaner rulebook, funded-stage EA use, or fewer product-specific traps.

Visit Sure Leverage Funding

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Sure Leverage Funding really offer static drawdown?

Yes. The current standard Instant Funding product uses an 8% static max drawdown and a 4% daily loss limit. That is still SLF’s clearest selling point.

What is the Sure Leverage Funding discount code?

The current FundedTrading code is FT for 30% off.

Are payouts really processed in 24 hours?

SLF’s public rules say eligible payouts are processed within 24 business hours, with an extra 10% on the split if that window is missed.

Can you use EAs with Sure Leverage Funding?

Only in the EA Challenge phase. Funded-stage EA use is not allowed on that product, and EAs are also not allowed on the main Instant Funding, Pro, Zero, 1 Step, 2 Step, and Free Challenge products.

What payment methods does Sure Leverage Funding use for withdrawals?

The current general rules list Rise and USDT on TRC20.

Is Sure Leverage Funding a scam?

It does not look like a dead or fake brand. It has live public rules, active support channels, and a current Trustpilot profile. The bigger concern is rule complexity, not whether the site exists.

What is the easiest SLF product for most traders?

For most traders, the standard Instant Funding product is the easiest one to justify because the static drawdown is easier to manage than SLF’s trailing alternatives.

Author By

Alex Firdaus

Trusted Media Network, Industry Award Organizer, Prop Trading Specialists.

Alex Firdaus is Head of Media at FinMedia Group and lead editor at FundedTrading.com. A crypto trader since 2017, he specialises in prop trading rules, funding models, and risk systems, with a background in SEO, professional copywriting, and search quality evaluation. You can connect with Alex on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandri-firdaus/

Credentials

Experience

Found Some Issue?
If you spot incorrect info (like payout stats, rules, or contact details)

Subscribe to the FundedTrading newsletter

Be the first to know about new reviews, blogs, and prop trading news.

All Sure Leverage Funding Awards

Report Issue Sure Leverage Funding

We’re eager to receive your feedback!