The big story here is not a new TradingFunds challenge model. It is the move into FTUK. On the current TradingFunds homepage, the firm says it is now part of FTUK and that new challenges are available exclusively on FTUK. At the same time, TradingFunds says existing accounts remain active, pending payouts continue, and traders keep the same platforms and support team.

That matters for search intent. A trader looking up TradingFunds today is really making a decision about the FTUK funding flow, not a separate standalone checkout. So this review should be read as a transition review: the TradingFunds name still matters, but the current offer path sits with FTUK.

Use the code on the FTUK checkout, not on an old TradingFunds purchase flow. The reason is simple: TradingFunds now points new customers toward FTUK. That makes FT20 the most useful answer for both conversion and clarity.

You can take that code straight to the FTUK affiliate link here: FTUK challenge checkout. If you want to compare it against other offers first, send readers to the FundedTrading discount page.

The current FTUK pricing module shows a wider product shelf than the old short-form TradingFunds pitch. New traders can choose from Flex Challenge, Instant Funding, One Step, Two Step, and SIM-based options, with account sizes from $5,000 to $150,000. The same section shows MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker, and FTUK XT as platform options, although FTUK notes that MetaTrader 5 is not available for US traders.

The parts most traders will care about are clear enough. FTUK pushes fast payouts, flexible models, weekend holding, and no news restriction across the main forex challenge options. It also leans hard on the old TradingFunds-style appeal: easier rules to understand, quicker access to funding, and less friction around trading style.

For readers comparing choices, it makes sense to check this against the full FTUK review and the broader prop firm comparison page before buying.

For most readers, the answer is yes, but with a small translation step. If you liked TradingFunds because of the simpler rule style and platform mix, FTUK looks like the continuation path. If you wanted a fully separate TradingFunds operation, that is not what new buyers are getting anymore.

The current public signals are enough to say TradingFunds is still operating in a visible, active form, but now under the FTUK umbrella. The transition is explained on the official site, the FTUK purchase flow is live, and both TradingFunds and FTUK still have public review profiles traders can inspect before buying.

That said, this is still prop firm territory. Traders should read the rules carefully, especially payout terms, drawdown structure, and what changes between account models. FTUK also states in its footer that funded accounts operate in simulated environments and that payouts are discretionary, which is standard language worth reading before purchase.

If legitimacy is your main concern, the safest path is to treat this as a live but evolving brand transition: active enough to consider, but still worth checking against recent user feedback and your own preferred rule set.

TradingFunds is now best understood as a lead-in to FTUK. That is the core point this page needs to answer fast. New customers are really choosing FTUK products, while older TradingFunds users keep their existing accounts. For ranking purposes, that gives this page a clean angle: explain the transition, answer the coupon query early, and keep the buying path simple.

If the trader wants the shortest possible answer, it is this: TradingFunds now routes new accounts through FTUK, and the coupon code to use is FT20 for 20% off.