FundedTrading
Reseña de prop firm

WeMasterTrade

Eleva tu éxito en el prop trading

WeMasterTrade destaca por su flexibilidad: ofrece un Challenge Package de 2 fases apto para principiantes (hasta un 90% de reparto de beneficios) y varias opciones de Instant Funding sin fases para traders que quieren capital de inmediato. Las tarifas son bajas en relación con el tamaño de cuenta, los payouts son rápidos (a menudo en un día) y reglas como el news trading libre y el uso de EAs son especialmente permisivas, aunque los límites de riesgo más ajustados de los paquetes Instant y la falta de la "red de seguridad" de un challenge los hacen más adecuados para traders con más experiencia.

Visitar sitio web
Puntuación general
8,4/10
Fundadajun 2022
SedeCanadá
CEOAndrew Anth
Tipos de activosForex

Valoración

WeMasterTrade destaca por su flexibilidad: ofrece un Challenge Package de 2 fases apto para principiantes (hasta un 90% de reparto de beneficios) y varias opciones de Instant Funding sin fases para traders que quieren capital de inmediato. Las tarifas son bajas en relación con el tamaño de cuenta, los payouts son rápidos (a menudo en un día) y reglas como el news trading libre y el uso de EAs son especialmente permisivas, aunque los límites de riesgo más ajustados de los paquetes Instant y la falta de la "red de seguridad" de un challenge los hacen más adecuados para traders con más experiencia.

Condiciones de trading

Apalancamiento (Forex)
1:100
Instrumentos
Forex, Oro (XAUUSD), CFDs de acciones, Índices (con comisión en Forex/XAUUSD/Acciones; Índices sin comisión).
Plataformas de trading
MT5MT5cTradercTraderMatch TraderMatch Trader

Reglas de trading

Permitido
Sin swapNews tradingAsesores expertos (EA)
Prohibido
Regla de consistencia

Payouts

Reparto máximo
90%
Reparto de premios
Challenge Package: 90% (financiada), 30% en la Fase 2. Instant Package: hasta el 90%, el reparto se aplica desde la activación de la cuenta (sin fase de challenge).
Ciclo de payout
Payouts a demanda, sin ciclo fijo; primer payout en 1 día, los siguientes sin límite de tiempo.
Métodos de pago
Transferencia bancariaTransferencia bancariaTarjeta de crédito/débitoCriptoPayPalPayPalMétodos de pago locales
Métodos de retiro
Transferencia bancariaTransferencia bancariaRiseworksRiseworksCriptoPayPalPayPal
Sobre el autor de la reseñaReseña independiente
Alex Firdaus
Alex Firdaus
Director de medios y revisor principal

Alex Firdaus es Director de Medios en FinMedia Group y editor principal de FundedTrading.com. Opera cripto desde 2014, a lo largo de tres ciclos de mercado completos, y de ahí nació su interés por los modelos de financiación y la mecánica de los payouts. Antes de dedicarse a cubrir prop firms pasó casi una década como evaluador de calidad de búsqueda de Google, con experiencia adicional evaluando resultados para Bing, y después trabajó en consultoría SEO. Dirige la estrategia de contenido y búsqueda de FundedTrading.com desde 2022 y lee directamente las páginas de reglas de cada firma en lugar de basarse en otras reseñas. Su cobertura se centra en el cálculo del drawdown, los requisitos para cobrar payouts, las reglas de consistencia y la diligencia debida de las prop firms.

¿Encontraste un error?¿Ves datos de payouts, reglas o precios incorrectos? Avísanos y lo verificaremos.

Esta reseña la mantiene el equipo editorial de FundedTrading.com. Las puntuaciones se basan en datos públicos e informes verificados de usuarios. Las cifras de payouts y los precios de los challenges pueden cambiar, así que confirma las condiciones vigentes directamente con WeMasterTrade. Esto no es asesoría financiera.

Reseñas · 1

Reseñas enviadas por traders sobre WeMasterTrade

Ver todas las reseñas
Resumen de reseñas con IA
El resumen con IA aparece cuando hay suficientes reseñas de traders.

Desglose de notas

Desde 1 traders
50% · 0
40% · 0
30% · 0
20% · 0
1100% · 1
1,0
1 reseña
A
ArkadiuszPLVerificado
Malo· hace 1 mes
Denied payout, SCAM!

My 11280.25 USD profit request was denied due to "manipulation of profit consistency- ""Placing Unusual Loss-Making Trades After Large Gains"". On top of the 20% consistency rule, they also have a "Profit Consistency Manipulation" clause, which they can interpret however suits them. On the day in question, I made a $3.6k profit on a WMT short. I also closed some losing positions that day. However, those positions had been opened one and two days earlier as part of my regular trading — they were not opened after the WMT gain, nor were they in any way related to it. Position sizing was also in line with my usual sizing. There was nothing irregular about any of it. To show how absurd this is: I traded this account for several months and placed over 100 trades in that time. After I contested their reasoning and pointed out that the positions had been opened before, not after, the gain, I received a copy-paste response within two minutes (!) stating that the decision was final and that I could reset my account. They didn't even bother to review the case. The rule itself makes no sense. I could have simply closed the WMT trade at, say, $2k profit and immediately reopened it. It's just an excuse to deny payouts. This is just the tip of the iceberg of my experience with them. When I was close to hitting my profit target for the first time, they migrated all MatchTrader accounts to cTrader without any prior notice. I had positions open going into the weekend that would have taken me over the $10k target on Monday. Instead, I received a cTrader account a few days later and all my open positions had been cancelled. So I had to keep trading only to have my payout rejected on an arbitrary technicality in the end. After the migration to cTrader, the spread problems started. 1%+ spread on Nvidia, several % on some large-cap stocks. At first I assumed these were temporary liquidity issues, but in hindsight it may well have been deliberate. When I reported it on Discord with screenshots, I got the classic copy-paste response: "Spreads are dynamic and depend on current market conditions and liquidity. During periods of higher volatility or lower liquidity, spreads may widen accordingly." That obviously made no sense, since the issue was constant, not occasional. After I reported it a second time, they… banned me from the Discord. I also emailed them about a position that was closed at a stop loss 3% below the spot price — the SL was triggered by a sudden spread blowout — costing me almost $1k. No reply. Customer service is terrible as well (with the exception of Rachel, who is genuinely helpful). Most of the staff don't seem to speak English; they appear to run everything through translators and pre-written replies. What makes this especially disappointing is that, due to a bug on their end, I had previously been given multiple free accounts. I reported it honestly and they were closed. When it was their turn to be honest, I got a reset offer. The consistency they should be worried about isn't in my trading. It's in the way every single dispute ended the same way: a template, a closed ticket, and no money.